Greetings from Georgia

Hi from Athens NeuroTraining Center

Hello from NJ, USA!

Hello from Estonia! I study psychology at the uni of Tartu :)

Greetings from Slovakia

Hello from Greece!

Hi! From Sweden but currently in Italy: University of Milan-Bicocca, studying postgraduate psychology. Did my undergraduate at University of Essex

Hello from Czech Republic 💕

Hello from Hungary

For those interest in Cadell's work: https://cadelllast.com/

Sayyara from Baku

Cadell's YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/TheAdvancedApes

Thanks!

Those of you guys who like to engage in a continuous flat network discussion on these and related matters are most welcome to join the Intellectual Deep Web mailing list. If you have the exquisite taste to enjoy Cadell's lectures, you're guaranteed to be a most welcome new member. Cheers! https://groups.google.com/g/intellectual-deep-web

Thanks Alex

Please also be aware we will have a Q&A after Cadell's presentation so please prepare some questions :)

La Greta, you rock big time!

:)

Thanks 🙂

says content unavailable on the link

Hello from Croatia🤗

Hi! :)

Hello from Brazil!

If you haven't registered a Google Groups account to access the Intellectual Deep Web link, just email me in private to bardissimo@gmail.com and I'll add you. While also have you in my address book, yippie!

Radical!

great, thanks Alex

This is sooo wonderfully Hegelian.

can we have the ppt in pdf form?or any handout?

Yes, we'll share the slides on our Facebook page after the event

Here's the link to our Society Page: https://www.facebook.com/UoEPsychoanalyticSociety

that is great! thank you!

Subjectivity cannot be mapped, so true!

Hey Greta! Will the recording also be shared?

Yes indeed, Mehaq :)

and the recording too,Greta? I was 15minutes late...

Yes, Payel!

Okay. Thank you! :)

ok,thank you Greta....

Please remember to provide that link again at the end

Immanent disasters: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=630qu6u7JN4&

I also think it is phallic all the way

Hello from Greece! Can we have the script of the presentation via mail? (Congrats!!!)

We will circulate slides + recording via our FB and social media channels, Maria

Thanks!!

if AI takes over, unconciousness will disappear

Thanks a lot Cadell for the presentation !

Awesome presentation Cadell!

Thank you

Truly outstanding

Excellent! Thanks!

Thank you very much.

Aplausi

Amazing presentation!!

thankuu

Thanks!

thank you! great presentation!

Congrats! Amazing!

Thank you so much!

Thank you from the inspiring presentation Cadell!

Thanks!!!

Thank you very much!

Is there a recording available somewhere?

very amusing!

Thank you so much for this journey through your presentation!

Arrived late. will the full recording be available at a later date?

Thank you! All hail Hegel!

thank you ,very inspiring presentation

Thank you. ()

Thank you! I like the "22nd century: ???"-thing. What do you think about the interrelationship between your cross-discplinary field and entropy/metabolism/biodiversity/consumption of upcoming human patterns of cogniton? Is the future all-too-human or less Anthopocen(e)tric?

If psychoanalysis is an art form, and neurology is a science. Is neuropsychoanalysis then an art form or a science?

Can I make a live question?

Yes, Davide - you are second in the line

Is there a recording available somewhere?

There will be a recording after the event, we will post this on our FB page

sure thanks!

the neuropsychanalytic view on the "hard" problem is best formulated in "The Hidden Spring" by mark solms. Just out!

Since neuroscience tech moves from simply "studying" the brain and subjectivity into "shaping" the brain and subjectivity in new tech-hybrid ways, then neuroscience tech itself moves more into the field of art.

After Davide, we will have questions from the chat + live questions from Mika and Alexandra

Interesting, so the fact Big Tech can “grasp” the brain via data, etc. makes them “want” to believe subjectivity can be reduced to the brain, for then we are mor controllable, easier to determine what we want as consumers, etc. This would be evidence of Cadell’s point that “desire” plays a role in science, tech, etc.

may I also ask live?

Yes Triin; you are currently fourth in line

thanks

Cadell, you mentioned you thoughts about Freud's views on neuroscience. What do you think Lacan's views would be on neuroscience?

You could scan a patient brain before starting the psychoanalysis and observe over the time which part of brain has been stimulated by undergoing on psychoanalysis? The patient will be the bridge between art of talking “psychoanalysis” and neuroscience as a scientific side.

Question (chat): There are many 'Freuds'. You distinguish neuroscience and psychoanalysis, but how about the 'Entwürf', where Freud prematurely (?) attempted to create a neurological account of the psychic apparatus. And by times, he anticipitad the time where this would actually be possible.

And also relevant: "Simulating the mind, a technical neuropsycvhoanalytical approach" edit by Dietrich, Fodor Zuckner Bruckner Wien 2009

Indeed Koen, see the "rewrite"of the project by Mark Solms in the latest issue of Neuropsychoanalysis (in print)

I'd love to ask a question.

Thanks Daniel, you can go after Triin if we have enough time (fingers crossed!)

Mika LeNoone is a Hegelian savant, beautiful!

Could I ask please ?Do you think that experiential exercises, for example, the technique of theatrical therapy could bring the person closer to his unconscious thoughts and could be a study to measure potentially to the unconscious?Sorry, if my questions are limited knowledge but I am in my first year of psychology and trying to understand some concepts. Thank you very much. Elena

Thank you Greta, and if not, I completely understand.

Question: What are your thoughts on the drive to create under the umbrella of both psychoanalysis and neuroscience? Will future technology influence our ways of making art? I am speaking as an art psychotherapist, and the potential of influencing innate art making.

Black Mirror, White Christmas - awesome allusion

Freud also loved Dostoevsky, so that was a good allusion too.

the model of communication cadell is describing is called "the conduit metaphor" in linguistics, but was first refuted more accurately as the "shannon/weaver model of communication" by McLuhan and Nevitt

You mentioned Heidegger as an example of a thinker of absence. My question would be, how do you deal with Heidegger's (and in his wake Jacques Derrida's) intention of a deconstruction of the metaphysics of presence? In the eyes of these thinkers, the scientificity of science itself (i.e. essentially the aspiration to deliver universal valid results) is necessarily connected with the interpretation of the meaning of being as presence. In the eyes of these thinkers, this radically limits the possibilities of genuinely philosophical way of expression and leads to a thinking (and speaking or writing) that must be performative and self-reflexive.

“amongst others” : parmis les autres

Fiannly: two articvles by Karl Friston on biological subjectivity:

QUESTION: Cadell speaks of ‘disengaging’ from algorithms. Does he think he can ‘disengage’ from ‘Darwinian algorithms’ of a plural mind theorised as computational modules by evolutionary psychologists? Does he have thoughts about how those modules might be compared to psychoanalytic complexes, and/or Jung’s archetypal hypothesis? (Psychiatric scholar McGilchrist cites Jung several times in The Master and his Emissary investigating the bihemispheric brain.)

how can students in the psychology field intertwine both neuroscience and psychoanalysis in their future career?

Ellen: this might be of interest, https://npsa-association.org/education-training/

Life as we know it Karl friston in J.R.Soc Interface 10:2013.047 and The deafult-mode-, ego-function and free energy: a neurobiological of Freudina theories Carhart-Harris and Fritson in Brain 2010: 133

Thank you Cadell

Cadell: can not each individual's particular grasp of the plenitude of objective particulars (to the exclusion of the rest) comprising the total sum historical/technical/social/proximal contingencies which create our shared world account for the negative definition of being? i.e. we're defined by our ignorance?

I have a question I'd want to do live about the hiearchy of the evidence based "pyramid"

Thanks Erik, if we have time - next up is Daniel

Okay =)

thanks ,, so much interesting

thanks a lot Cadell it was useful

hahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

so good example

Nothing exists outside the text.

nothing in the text exists in the embodied present moment!

Thank you all for your participation! Really appreciate the attendance. Please do visit and give our page a follow, we've got more events lined up, including a psychotherapy workshop on March 10th: https://www.facebook.com/UoEPsychoanalyticSociety

team clinton!

Our events are completely free and run purely by caffeine and enthusiasm : )

So…make something less complete in order to make it more complete…

AI is scarily limiting

artificial inteligence

Before A.I. polling and audiance testing which lead to making movies based on "The best parts" was optimization of the individual toward the same mean line of the average. it's the same limit

Thank You

Thanks Cadell!!

And Essex U!

Thank you!

Truly magnificent, thank you!

Incredibly compelling. Thanks to all involved!

thank you!!

Thanks!

Thank you Greta and Cadell. bye to all of you

Thanks)

Thank you!

Thanks

thanks!

Thanks

Thank you. Great presentation

Thanks!!!!

Thank you very much!